[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Kai, this is slightly better, but please see below:
I get the part about 2 <relation> elements being comparable if the Value of both contain the same text. However, do you really mean to compare just the "text value" of their descendent nodes to determine changes? I interpret "text value" to mean only those descendent nodes that are text() nodes, and I suspect you mean something else. Also, does this mean your "unit of difference" is the <relation> element, and it's suffucient to stop "differencing" at that level? (Meaning, if a relation element is deemed to be "added", it and contained nodes will be shown, with no effort to determine which contained nodes changed.)
Using your samples below, would you provide a "result document" that you're after? Actually seeing a result, with annotations if necessary, would help in making this more concrete.
Regards,
--A
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Re: [xsl] comparing nodesets to each other
Subject: Re: [xsl] comparing nodesets to each other From: "Aron Bock" <aronbock@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:56:46 +0000 |
Kai, this is slightly better, but please see below:
I try to be more exact in my definition: - two nodes 'relation' are different, if they have the same value in relation/Attribute[@Name='FindNumber']/Value but the text value of both node's children at all is different.
I get the part about 2 <relation> elements being comparable if the Value of both contain the same text. However, do you really mean to compare just the "text value" of their descendent nodes to determine changes? I interpret "text value" to mean only those descendent nodes that are text() nodes, and I suspect you mean something else. Also, does this mean your "unit of difference" is the <relation> element, and it's suffucient to stop "differencing" at that level? (Meaning, if a relation element is deemed to be "added", it and contained nodes will be shown, with no effort to determine which contained nodes changed.)
Using your samples below, would you provide a "result document" that you're after? Actually seeing a result, with annotations if necessary, would help in making this more concrete.
Regards,
--A
> >I try to show the structure of the recipe (eased): > > > ><object> > > <relation> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="FindNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[0005]]></Value> > > <Attribute> > > <Attribute Type="float" Name="... > > <object> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="PartNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[Part1]]></Value> > > </Attribute> > > </object> > > </relation> > > <relation> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="FindNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[0010]]></Value> > > <Attribute> > > <Attribute Type="float" Name="... > > <object> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="PartNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[Part2]]></Value> > > </Attribute> > > </object> > > </relation> > > <relation> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="FindNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[0015]]></Value> > > <Attribute> > > <Attribute Type="float" Name="... > > <object> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="PartNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[Part3]]></Value> > > </Attribute> > > </object> > > </relation> > ></object> > > > >needs to be compared against a similar structure: > ><object> > > <relation> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="FindNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[0005]]></Value> > > <Attribute> > > <Attribute Type="float" Name="... > > <object> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="PartNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[Part1]]></Value> > > </Attribute> > > </object> > > </relation> > > <relation> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="FindNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[0015]]></Value> > > <Attribute> > > <Attribute Type="float" Name="... > > <object> > > <Attribute Type="string" Name="PartNumber"> > > <Value><![CDATA[Part3b]]></Value> > > </Attribute> > > </object> > > </relation> > ></object> > > > >(Attribute nodes are more than one per object or relation node)
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] comparing nodesets to eac, Kai Hackemesser | Thread | [xsl] Extra newline remove on text , Brendan Benke |
Re: [xsl] If Current Node Is Ancest, omprakash . v | Date | Re: [xsl] How to create a node set , Mukul Gandhi |
Month |