[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi David & Michael,
I have 10,116kb (~9.87Mb) xml-source file, in it I have 60,960 records of <item>
I get the following loading time:
** In the first three cases I use the format-date template.
I have Pentium4, CPU 2.4Ghz, 0.5G RAM, and Im running on windows 2000 pro.
I run my XML through iexplorer (I dont want/need to use other 3-party as saxon, just IE6)
1. How can I know what XSLT processor Im using and in which version? (I guess Im using Microsoft).
2. From your experience what you can tell about my performance?
3. I think that the div (=divide) command in the format-bytes is the heavy thing. does someone have an alternative to my algorithm?
4. Apparently I'm not using xslt2 because I get the following error "Keyword xsl:stylesheet may not contain xsl:function". Where can I find the built-in date handling functions? Does it work only with elements and xslt2? should I move to xslt2 ? how can I do it ?
5. Michael, I read somewhere that you said it is better to use <template match=..> instead of <for-each> what about my case ?
6. Ill be happy to get any tweaks to make it 10% faster, because I need to come-up with a size-limit to my file and then not to let people to open my file in IE, but to use other methods. My xml file is basically a database which I let it be displayed as html under certain size-limit.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
RE: [xsl] Performance problem
Subject: RE: [xsl] Performance problem From: "ficfic m" <ficfic@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:32:42 +0200 |
Hi David & Michael,
I have 10,116kb (~9.87Mb) xml-source file, in it I have 60,960 records of <item>
I get the following loading time:
If I use the format-bytes ** 61-64sec If I use the bytes-format without format-number() ** 61sec If I only print value of the bytes ** 44sec If I only print value of the timestamp & bytes 41sec
** In the first three cases I use the format-date template.
I have Pentium4, CPU 2.4Ghz, 0.5G RAM, and Im running on windows 2000 pro.
I run my XML through iexplorer (I dont want/need to use other 3-party as saxon, just IE6)
1. How can I know what XSLT processor Im using and in which version? (I guess Im using Microsoft).
2. From your experience what you can tell about my performance?
3. I think that the div (=divide) command in the format-bytes is the heavy thing. does someone have an alternative to my algorithm?
4. Apparently I'm not using xslt2 because I get the following error "Keyword xsl:stylesheet may not contain xsl:function". Where can I find the built-in date handling functions? Does it work only with elements and xslt2? should I move to xslt2 ? how can I do it ?
5. Michael, I read somewhere that you said it is better to use <template match=..> instead of <for-each> what about my case ?
6. Ill be happy to get any tweaks to make it 10% faster, because I need to come-up with a size-limit to my file and then not to let people to open my file in IE, but to use other methods. My xml file is basically a database which I let it be displayed as html under certain size-limit.
Thanks in advance ficfic
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Performance problem, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Performance problem, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Avoiding dummy xsl:if wit, Frans Englich | Date | Re: [xsl] Performance problem, David Carlisle |
Month |