[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Document function handling POST instead of GET


Subject: Re: [xsl] Document function handling POST instead of GET
From: Micah Dubinko <micah@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:50:54 -0700

Perhaps you can have your server setup such that ahead-of-time (before the XSLT) you can associate particular states (like a specific query + connection string) with specific URLs. Then, from within the XSLT, GET the resulting URLs...

.micah

Antsnio Mota wrote:

I want to use POST in a idempotent (how like that word!) way, thus i
have no side-efects here. The problem is i probably will have lots of
data to pass, longer than can fit in a URL. Specifically to my
problem, i want to pass SQL SELECT clauses tha can be somewhat big,
and also connection strings.

Can there be a simpler solution?


Thanks.


On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:33:40 GMT, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Can i use the same construct for a POST method?


You would have to use an extension function, but even then doing an
operation like POST from a side effect free language like XSLT is
slightly problematic.

--
 Available for consulting. XForms, web forms, information overload.
 Micah Dubinko                           mailto:micah@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Brain Attic, L.L.C.                        http://brainattic.info
 Yahoo IM: mdubinko
 Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com


Current Thread
Keywords