[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
The mathematicians' bosses do not stand behind them, looking over their shoulders, asking how much longer it takes for a solution, perhaps? :-)
Thank you for the other solution. I was actually starting myself on generating such a two-pass solution, so I am glad that this seems okay to other people as well.
I am very happy for the answers on this list - I learn something new every time I struggle with XSL.
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
Re: [xsl] Counting level of nodes beneath current (in XPATH)
Subject: Re: [xsl] Counting level of nodes beneath current (in XPATH) From: "Ragulf Pickaxe" <jawxml@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:36:03 +0000 |
> The solution is not near what I hoped as it seems to be very slow.
Speed's all relative, it took 300 years to solve Fermat's last theorem. Why is everyone in such a rush these days:-)
The mathematicians' bosses do not stand behind them, looking over their shoulders, asking how much longer it takes for a solution, perhaps? :-)
David
Thank you for the other solution. I was actually starting myself on generating such a two-pass solution, so I am glad that this seems okay to other people as well.
I am very happy for the answers on this list - I learn something new every time I struggle with XSL.
Ragulf Pickaxe :-)
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Counting level of nodes b, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Counting level of nodes b, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] msxml apostrophe encoding, Geert Josten | Date | [xsl] Re: Restrict Mixed Content, Edgar Steven |
Month |