[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
I tested it and you are right. I guess the node-set function treats the document fragment as a document opened with document().
No node-set function, no nodes from the fragment in your key...
Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listing
Subject: Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listing From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:16:39 +0100 |
>Can anyone tell me how that fits into the XSLT 1 recommendation?
node-set function is not part of XSLT 1.0 spec. It
will be treated as an extension function..
By the way, I realize that it opens an alternative
to the node-set function! Wrap your fragment in some obscure element name (or just use some
namespace) and add a key that only matches that
element. Should work, I guess..
I think this will not work in XSLT 1.0 . key function requires some document *node* to operate on. It will not work on RTFs.. XSLT 2.0 I believe treats RTFs as node sets..
I tested it and you are right. I guess the node-set function treats the document fragment as a document opened with document().
No node-set function, no nodes from the fragment in your key...
Cheers, Geert
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listi, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listi, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listi, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Tree from directory listi, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords