[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to?

---

---

Hi Jeni,

Thanks a lot for the very detailed and instructive reply.

I had thought about changing the namespace for the XSLT 2.0
stylesheets and decided to rely on this approach as a last resort.

And you are right -- RNG is much more elegant and useful.

Thanks for finding time to reply even during the weekend.

Dimitre.

> Right: using a schema to *validate* XSLT stylesheets isn't worthwhile
> (and that's what the subject line indicated you were asking about),
> but using a schema for other reasons (such as intellisense, or when
> querying/generating XSLT using XSLT 2.0) could be, potentially.
> 
> The usual way to get around the lack of support for co-occurrence
> constraints in WXS is to use xsi:type. So... you could design a schema
> in which there were version 1.0 and version 2.0 types for each
> element. Then use the xsi:type attribute to indicate the version
> you're using in the stylesheet. For example:
> 
> <xs:element name="stylesheet" type="stylesheet" />
> 
> <!-- general type allows anything allowed by XSLT (incorporating
>     forwards-compatibility) -->
> <xs:complexType name="stylesheet">
>  <xs:sequence>
>    <xs:element name="import" type="import"
>                minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>    <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>      <xs:any namespace="##targetNamespace" processContents="lax" />
>      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" />
>    </xs:choice>
>  </xs:sequence>
>  <xs:attribute name="version" use="required" type="xs:decimal" />
>  ...
> </xs:complexType>
> 
> <!-- restricted type only allows XSLT 1.0 stylesheets -->
> <xs:complexType name="stylesheet-v1.0">
>  <xs:complexContent>
>    <xs:restriction base="stylesheet">
>      <xs:sequence>
>        <xs:element name="import" type="import-v1.0"
>                    minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>        <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>          <xs:element name="template" type="template-v1.0" />
>          ...
>          <xs:any namespace="##other" />
>        </xs:choice>
>      </xs:sequence>
>      <xs:attribute name="version" fixed="1.0" />
>    </xs:restriction>
>  </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
> 
> <!-- restricted type only allows XSLT 2.0 stylesheets -->
> <xs:complexType name="stylesheet-v2.0">
>  <xs:complexContent>
>    <xs:restriction base="stylesheet">
>      <xs:sequence>
>        <xs:element name="import" type="import-v2.0"
>                    minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>        <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>          <xs:element name="template" type="template-v2.0" />
>          ...
>          <xs:any namespace="##other" />
>        </xs:choice>
>      </xs:sequence>
>      <xs:attribute name="version" fixed="2.0" />
>    </xs:restriction>
>  </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
> 
> and then use:
> 
> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xsi:type="stylesheet-v1.0" ...>
> 
> in your stylesheet.
> 
> The trouble with this approach (aside from its complexity) is that
> once you use a literal result element in your stylesheet, its content
> can't be constrained based on the version of XSLT you're using. You
> could declare all the literal result elements that you use in your
> stylesheet, or you could use <xsl:element> and <xsl:attribute>
> instead.
> 
> Other possibilities are just using an XSLT 2.0 schema all the time,
> and relying on your knowledge of XSLT 1.0 to prevent you using XSLT
> 2.0 elements in an XSLT 1.0 stylesheet; or you could use a fake
> namespace for your XSLT 2.0 stylesheets (changing it on load and on
> save) and get different schemas for different stylesheets. If the
> software picks up on the xsi:schemaLocation attribute, then you could
> use that to indicate the schema that you wanted to use with a
> particular stylesheet.
> 
> If the software supports RELAX NG, you're in better luck, because you
> can use co-occurrence constraints with RNG, and wildcards in RNG are a
> lot more flexible than those in WXS.
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeni
> 
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/

---