[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling - only print *first* in sorted list??
Subject: Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling - only print *first* in sorted list?? From: "Hardy Merrill" <HMerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:38:51 -0400 |
I like the idea, but I don't know how to do that. Can you take pity on an XSL newbie and kindly show me how to do that? >>> marvin.the.cynical.robot@xxxxxxxxx 10/12/04 10:09AM >>> Hi, Why dont you write a second XSL program and have it operate on the sorted output of the first? The document order for the preceding-sibling in the second program will be the right order that you need. Regards, Kenneth On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:55:29 -0400, Hardy Merrill <hmerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was trying to use "preceding-sibling" to figure out if the previous > sibling ***in sorted order*** had the same district, but I've now > figured out after reading on the subject that "preceding-sibling" does > not operate on the sorted tree - instead it operates on the original > tree that is in "document" order. > > I'd like to use the best/most efficient method to solve this problem - > the muncheon technique using keys if possible. Can I do that, and if > so, how?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen | Thread | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen |
Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen | Date | Re: [xsl] Checking for instance of , Jeni Tennison |
Month |
Keywords