[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
So what are you writing it in? I would have guessed C#, but the reference to "compile to ... various native architectures" leaves me unsure.
Will look forward to it. The more (free) implementations, the better.
Bruce
Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives? From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:44:09 -0400 |
On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
My own xslt 2.0 processor should compile to the .NET platform as well as various native architectures, and so should also run on Mono,
So what are you writing it in? I would have guessed C#, but the reference to "compile to ... various native architectures" leaves me unsure.
I haven't tested this as I don't have a windows machine, nor a compiler to target .NET, and I haven't bothered to ask anyone else to try this out yet, as it's still alpha.
Will look forward to it. The more (free) implementations, the better.
Bruce
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams |
| Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 and alternatives, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] links don't work when IE , Passin, Tom |
| Month |
Keywords