[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi Jan,
First: your file is not really a html file, but xslt, so it should have a .xsl suffix (test.xsl).
Try it this way (test.xsl):
Jan Mattila wrote:
Re: [xsl] Time stamp with emacs
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Time stamp with emacs From: Anton Triest <anton@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:03:09 +0200 |
Hi Jan,
First: your file is not really a html file, but xslt, so it should have a .xsl suffix (test.xsl).
Also, the stylesheet needs a processing instruction pointing to itself: <?xml-stylesheet href="test.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
On the xsl-list homepage there's a good example of a standalone stylesheet: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/processor-version.xsl
Try it this way (test.xsl):
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="test.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!-- Time-stamp: "2004-09-25 16:37:55 janmatti" -->
<html xsl:version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/strict">
<head></head>
<body>
<p>
<xsl:value-of select="document('')/comment()[1]"/>
</p>
</body>
</html>HTH, Anton
Jan Mattila wrote:
Hello.
I tried Dave Pawson's trick for getting a time stamp by using Emacs, and everything worked up to the part, when you see the timestamp on the web-page. I don't see it.
I an utter noob, so I might be making some silly mistake somewhere, but I cannot spot it.
Here's my test.html file:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!-- Time-stamp: "2004-09-25 16:37:55 janmatti" --> <xsl:transform xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0"
<xsl:template match="/"> <html><head></head> <body> <p> This should be the timestamp <xsl:value-of select="document('')/comment()[1]"/> </p> </body> </html> </xsl:template> </xsl:transform>
As you can see it's an almost exact copy of the one in Dave's post "emacs time stamp" on "Thu, 9 Nov 2000 13:39:49 -0000"
I thought that maybe the name of the file (.html) is the problem, but when I tried test.xml I only got the document tree with my firefox-0.8:
"This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below."
So should the file name be .xml and then have something else to fix the style part? Or is there some other obvious mistake?
PaX.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Time stamp with emacs, Jan Mattila | Thread | [xsl] Javascript and XSLT, Jen Jiang |
| Re: [xsl] Re: [xslt transform & gro, Anton Triest | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: [xslt transform & gro, Xsl List |
| Month |