[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
I'm trying to get what I've been working on into shape to distribute more widely, and am wondering if my approach to modularizing the (xslt 2.0) code makes sense.
I have a main file that looks like:
<!-- set the citation class parameter (e.g. author-year) as specified in the style file -->
<xsl:param name="citation-class" select="$styles/cs:citationstyle/@class"/>
Each of these included files in turn includes other files. So, for example, core.xsl looks like:
<xsl:include href="core/css.xsl" />
<xsl:include href="core/functions.xsl" /> <!-- all function code -->
<xsl:include href="core/render-mods.xsl" /> <!-- all general rendering code -->
<xsl:include href="core/style.xsl" />
The "render-classes.xsl" file looks like this:
<xsl:include href="render-classes/author-year/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to author-year class -->
<xsl:include href="render-classes/note/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to footnote/endnote class -->
I am using conditional statements on the class-specific templates to keep stuff separate in processing.
Is it fine or me to be using include in this way, or is there a compelling reason for me to be importing instead? I recall Wendell's discussion about import precedence and such, but am not sure practically whether this matters in this case.
Bruce
[xsl] import/include and file structure
Subject: [xsl] import/include and file structure From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:40:35 -0400 |
I'm trying to get what I've been working on into shape to distribute more widely, and am wondering if my approach to modularizing the (xslt 2.0) code makes sense.
I have a main file that looks like:
<!-- read the external citation style file --> <xsl:param name="citation-style" required="yes" as="xs:string" />
<xsl:variable name="styles" as="document-node()" select="doc(concat('../styles/',$citation-style, '.csl'))" />
<!-- set the citation class parameter (e.g. author-year) as specified in the style file -->
<xsl:param name="citation-class" select="$styles/cs:citationstyle/@class"/>
<xsl:include href="core.xsl" /> <xsl:include href="drivers.xsl" /> <xsl:include href="render-classes.xsl" />
Each of these included files in turn includes other files. So, for example, core.xsl looks like:
<xsl:include href="core/css.xsl" />
<xsl:include href="core/functions.xsl" /> <!-- all function code -->
<xsl:include href="core/render-mods.xsl" /> <!-- all general rendering code -->
<xsl:include href="core/style.xsl" />
The "render-classes.xsl" file looks like this:
<xsl:include href="render-classes/author-year/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to author-year class -->
<xsl:include href="render-classes/note/render.xsl"/> <!-- all rendering code specific to footnote/endnote class -->
I am using conditional statements on the class-specific templates to keep stuff separate in processing.
Is it fine or me to be using include in this way, or is there a compelling reason for me to be importing instead? I recall Wendell's discussion about import precedence and such, but am not sure practically whether this matters in this case.
Bruce
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: sorting titles w stop, cking | Thread | [xsl] organization for large number, Brian Chrisman |
Re: [xsl] replacing repeating data , cking | Date | [xsl] organization for large number, Brian Chrisman |
Month |