[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms)
Subject: Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms) From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:02:36 +0100 |
On Friday 04 June 2004 14:29, Jeff Kenton wrote: > There are people who have 100 megabyte product catalogs in XML files. They > obviously don't serve the whole thing to a web page, but they do use XSLT > to process those catalogs, and produce small web pages or XML output for > reports. > We have seen really two types of request coming for very large transform support. The first is from companies where the data size is within the range of an object model based implementation, but who are aware that the ceiling for such solutions is not far above them. The second is companies who are doing data streaming (with embedded transforms) between systems. While you could argue that the first group will sleep better if they employ 64-bit machines this really does not address the CPU costs issues. The second group is harder to deal with in that they can view XSLT as just another pipeline process. To be fair there are not a significant number of companies with these problems but they do exist. Kev.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Király Péter | Thread | RE: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, David . Pawson |
Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Kevin Jones | Date | RE: [xsl] delete the white spaces, cknell |
Month |