[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge
Subject: RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) Challenge From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:49:58 +0400 (AMT) |
> > # >How long does it take, and how does the elapsed time vary as > # the table > # >size increases? Plotting that can often deepen your understanding of > # >what you are asking the XSLT processor to do. > # > # 64 rows: 2 secs > # 96 rows: 5 secs > # 128 rows: 10 secs > # 160 rows: 17 secs > # 192 rows: 30 secs > # 224 rows: 62 secs > # > # That is exponential... > > It looks quadratic to me, or perhaps just a little worse than quadratic. If > it was exponential, you really would have problems. > > (Quadratic goes 1,4,9,16,27,64,49,64,81,100. Exponential goes > 2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512) t=2+15*2^(r/32-5) gives 3.875 5.750 9.5 17 32 62 against 2 5 10 17 30 62 that is about 5% deviation for values starting with 10 seconds, It is exponential dependency. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) , Michael Müller-Hille |
RE: [xsl] table td width, Pieter Reint Siegers | Date | Re: [xsl] Omnimark vs. XSL (Saxon) , Wendell Piez |
Month |
Keywords