[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 8:47 AM +0100 7/21/03, David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I hope I won't have to, but who knows?
FYI, I wasn't referring to 2.0 here, but the version after that, formerly called Echo, now called whatever passes a trademark search. There's still time to fix this if we can convince the developers not to compromise on XML.
--
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises
|
Subject: RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:39:57 -0400 |
At 8:47 AM +0100 7/21/03, David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Why do I feel you'd write the same thing in 12 months time? 2.0 isn't much better in terms of implementation is it.
I hope I won't have to, but who knows?
FYI, I wasn't referring to 2.0 here, but the version after that, formerly called Echo, now called whatever passes a trademark search. There's still time to fix this if we can convince the developers not to compromise on XML.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises, bryan | Thread | RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises, Jim Fuller |
| RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Date | RE: [xsl] rss, in all its guises, David . Pawson |
| Month |
Keywords