[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step)
|
Subject: RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step) From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:01:09 +0200 |
>> I am sorry Bill, but XML is not a language but a meta >> language. >I thought a meta language was a kind of language. Wel if one gets abstract enough just about everything is a language. If a meta language has to possess all the normally defined qualities of a 'language' whatever these are, then yes a 'meta-language' is a language. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xs, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: Is XML a Language? (was RE: [xs, Didier PH Martin |
| [xsl] Passing document fragments as, Simon Kelly | Date | Re: [xsl] Passing document fragment, David Carlisle |
| Month |
Keywords