[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step
Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: Rob Rohan <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 04 Jul 2003 08:57:19 -0700 |
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 06:19, Claudio Russo wrote: > David, > > I agree with you, which comes back to my first expression. Why don't keep > XSLT for what it was created, presentation purposes (as Michael recalled > from the w3c sentence), and leave the process in the server level with more > specific elementary process programming under C, Java, Assy, compiled language, > giving the necessary XML view for the XSLT. Claudio, you can use XSLT just for presentation and live a long healthy life. No one will mock you. Feel free. However, I do so enjoy taking a semi-large document, running it through an XSLT process to get a smaller sub-set of data then using it via DOM in java. I think this is elegant way to keep the DOM small. There are also a myriad of ways to use XSLT that don't tread on the Assembly, Java, or C ground. I think the world should just throw away hammers because if you take a screw driver and use the butt end, you can hammer in nails if you try really hard. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Rohan <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Claudio Russo |
Re: [xsl] RuntimeException : Progra, Simon Kelly | Date | [xsl] node() problem, Greene, Stephen |
Month |