[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 12:48 PM 3/14/2003, Mike wrote:
Though (to suggest another extreme approach to this problem) a custom (home-cooked) serializer might be run on XML *representation* of the syntax. Which would amount to the post-processing solution.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Cold Fusion
Subject: Re: [xsl] Cold Fusion From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:27:41 -0500 |
At 12:48 PM 3/14/2003, Mike wrote:
So producing XML
that can be automatically serialized in this horrid syntax is nigh on impossible.
Though (to suggest another extreme approach to this problem) a custom (home-cooked) serializer might be run on XML *representation* of the syntax. Which would amount to the post-processing solution.
Cheers, Wendell
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Cold Fusion, Mike Brown | Thread | RE: [xsl] Differing behavior of Xal, Passin, Tom |
Re: [xsl] Choose Test for Emtpy ele, J.Pietschmann | Date | Re: [xsl] Choose Test for Emtpy ele, Wendell Piez |
Month |
Keywords