[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:48:57 +0100

>And earlier, IBM 
>had a product, TeXML I think it was, which provided a declarative XML
layer 
>over TeX that you could target in a transform ... then a back end
processor 
>could render it into TeX. (Ah, now I see Joe K. has mentioned that.
Check 
>out alphaworks.ibm.com.)

I'm rather interested in this one, did anyone ever try it out? 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, (continued) Jim Melton - Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:43:57 -0700 Zack Brown - Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:43:21 -0800 Oleg Tkachenko - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:54:21 +0200 Wendell Piez - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:19:13 -0500 bryan - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:48:57 +0100 <= David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:18:51 GMT David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:59:06 GMT W. Eliot Kimber - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:10:37 -0800 David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:09:10 GMT

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Wendell Piez	Thread	RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown	Date	Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Oleg Tkachenko
	Month

Keywords

xml

RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company