[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 07:16 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
That may be true, but is a dangerous way to code unless you really know what you're doing (and have a good reason to do it).
simon
<http://ThisURLEnablesEmailToGetThroughOverzealousSpamFilters.org>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Reference to variable cannot be resolved.
Subject: Re: [xsl] Reference to variable cannot be resolved. From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:09:58 -0500 |
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 07:16 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
Explaining to people why that's legal, after telling them they can only assign x once, is a nice challenge :)
If people don't understand that the same name can refer to different objects depending on the context, then they shouldn't be programming.
That may be true, but is a dangerous way to code unless you really know what you're doing (and have a good reason to do it).
simon
--- www.simonwoodside.com
<http://ThisURLEnablesEmailToGetThroughOverzealousSpamFilters.org>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Reference to variable can, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Reference to variable can, Mike Brown |
Re: xslt core and intuition was RE:, S Woodside | Date | Re: xslt core and intuition was RE:, Wendell Piez |
Month |