[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi Jeni
(... and do the same for all other places inside the func def where stuff from the calling context gets processed.)
That's what I thought from reading the correcponding sections of the spec. It's cleaner, but more typing.
I just got confused by the "initially" in
which seemed to imply the possibility of setting the focus/context, possibly to that of the function call.
Anyways, I'm all for clean concepts :)
Tobi
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context inside funcdefs
Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context inside funcdefs From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:26:54 +0100 |
Hi Jeni
> You have to do the latter: pass in the context node as an argument and > pass that node as the argument to the local-name() function.
(... and do the same for all other places inside the func def where stuff from the calling context gets processed.)
That's what I thought from reading the correcponding sections of the spec. It's cleaner, but more typing.
I just got confused by the "initially" in
"Within the body of a stylesheet function, the focus is initially undefined"
which seemed to imply the possibility of setting the focus/context, possibly to that of the function call.
Anyways, I'm all for clean concepts :)
Tobi
-- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context i, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context i, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Reference to variable can, Américo Albuquerque | Date | Re: [xsl] Reference to variable can, David Carlisle |
Month |