[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Finding the closest node (was Re: [xsl] inconsistent Preceding-Sibling behaviour when nested in For-Each
|
Subject: Re: Finding the closest node (was Re: [xsl] inconsistent Preceding-Sibling behaviour when nested in For-Each From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:36:10 +0100 |
At Monday, 04 November 2002, Ken wrote: >Use "( union|of|ancestors|goes|here )[last()]" because a predicate can be >added to the bracketed specification of a set of nodes. Grrr. I didn't even try this. What was I thinking? Thanks very much. It must be the neurons after all. ///Peter XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] RE: Problem With Differen, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] access document object du, Dan Diebolt |
| RE: [xsl] Excel XML tranformation, Thomas V. Nielsen | Date | RE: RE: RE: [xsl] JavaScript proble, Passin, Tom |
| Month |