[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 18:53 09/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
Am I completely wrong, or one the advantages is :
If your XSLT stylesheet is well-formed, then the result is automatically well-formed (in a XML transformation) ?
This is an excellent reason for me !
--
Paul TERRAY - Documents Management Systems Engineer
email : terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT? From: Paul Terray <terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:37:10 +0200 |
At 18:53 09/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
This is probably a FAQ, but I haven't found the answer. I've been doing some background research on XSLT as a programming language. Now I have grasped the concepts of declarative programming, but there's one important question left: what is the advantages of having XSLT expressed in XML syntax?
Am I completely wrong, or one the advantages is :
If your XSLT stylesheet is well-formed, then the result is automatically well-formed (in a XML transformation) ?
This is an excellent reason for me !
--
Paul TERRAY - Documents Management Systems Engineer
email : terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, scruss |
Re: [xsl] Node renaming problem, Ryan Beesley | Date | RE: [xsl] Using document(), Robert Koberg |
Month |