[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Macaulay,Malcolm (US) wrote:
that's not quite the case. What I'm needing to do is number *all* the defs if there are more than one. F'rinstance, given:
I would want:
1 physical or mental ... 2 a condition in which ...
Using the stylesheet including '<xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::def">' gives me
physical or mental ... 2 a condition in which ...
-> the first def isn't getting numbered. Blame the weirdness on dictionary conventions.
Thanks also to Wendell, whose "count(../def) > 1" expression is probably the easiest to understand of all the solutions, and to Dimitre's "preceding-sibling::def or following-sibling::def" solution is very efficient and logical.
Stewart
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this
Subject: Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling count than this From: "Stewart C. Russell" <scruss@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:55:05 -0400 |
Macaulay,Malcolm (US) wrote:
You don't need all the counting stuff. If I understand you correctly, the test is simply: "is there a preceding def element?".
that's not quite the case. What I'm needing to do is number *all* the defs if there are more than one. F'rinstance, given:
<psp type="n"> <def>physical or mental ...</def> <def>a condition in which ...</def> </psp>
I would want:
1 physical or mental ... 2 a condition in which ...
Using the stylesheet including '<xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::def">' gives me
physical or mental ... 2 a condition in which ...
-> the first def isn't getting numbered. Blame the weirdness on dictionary conventions.
Thanks also to Wendell, whose "count(../def) > 1" expression is probably the easiest to understand of all the solutions, and to Dimitre's "preceding-sibling::def or following-sibling::def" solution is very efficient and logical.
Stewart
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] a nicer total sibling cou, Macaulay,Malcolm (US | Thread | Re: Re: [xsl] a nicer total sibling, scruss |
Re: [xsl] Limiting a FOR-EACH loop, Vasu Chakkera | Date | [xsl] merging with document(), Jeff Shevlen |
Month |