[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:47:29 +0100 |
Hi Andrew, > I would extend that a little maybe to add some functionality to it, > so you could produce api docs javadoc stylee, listing template > names, functionality, params etc Absolutely. The benefit of allowing *any* element to be counted as a documentation element would be that it would be easy for people to create their own documentation standards. If I can get away with using XHTML, then I can use that; if you want something more sophisticated, like an XML version of JavaDoc, then you can use that. Another option would be for XSLT 2.0 to have a xsl:documentation element and allow anything to reside within that, or perhaps also allow an href to point to external documentation (I'd prefer it if my documentation structure wasn't dictated by anyone, so I wouldn't want the XSLT 2.0 Rec to go any further than that). Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, DPawson |
Re: [xsl] any good solution for cov, Larry Garfield | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, DPawson |
Month |