[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] java methods vs XSL templates
Subject: RE: [xsl] java methods vs XSL templates From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:49:58 +0100 |
> I have requirement for functionalities like date format > conversion ie from YYYYMMDD to DD:MM:YY.. now i can write a > java method that does this or i can write a xsl template > that will do this.I can then store it in an utility XSL file and keep > calling that template through xsl:call-templates , and pass > the date as > parameter and store the return value in a variable. > > i however think that writing a java method is a more elegant > way of doing > this ,as java code is precomplied and would take less processing time. > It's easy to do this using concat() and substring(). The extra processing speed of Java is offset by the cost of doing a function call from one language environment to another, and by the loss of portability. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] java methods vs XSL templ, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] Tokenizing nodes instead of s, Greg Martel |
Re: [xsl] XPath question, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Calculating a sum of roun, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords