[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] mystery #2: testing document() without failure

Subject: Re: [xsl] mystery #2: testing document() without failure
From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Apr 2002 12:12:18 -0400

>>>>> "M" == Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    M> Yes, it's explicitly implementation-defined what happens when
    M> the document referred to by the document() function doesn't
    M> exist. Either you get an error, or you get an empty node-set.

Or, as in the Xalan case, you get both for no extra charge ;)

Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@xxxxxxxxxxx> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread