[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] mystery #2: testing document() without failure

Subject: Re: [xsl] mystery #2: testing document() without failure
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:09:51 +0100

> So is it wrong to rely on something like (

'fraid so.

I think it's a bug in the spec, but the last time I checked it was the
same in the xslt2 drafts.

> it works in saxon.

don't rely on  everyone being as kind as Mike:-)
But try it with -w2 otption which asks saxon not to recover from errors
if it is not forced to by the spec.

xt used to die on this. Not sure about the others.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread