[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] XSL:FO and Unicode Fonts
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL:FO and Unicode Fonts From: "Joerg Heinicke" <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:33:26 +0100 |
> Is it impolite to ask a XSL:FO question here? > If so, could you please suggest a more aprt forum? It's ok. The list is about XSL, i.e. XSLT + XSL:FO. > And...is it impolite to ask about Unicode font support? > If not, how are people handling rendering of high UTF-8 > characters on a WIndows platform, as BOLD and ITALIC > and BOLD ITALIC? It's not the first question according Unicode ;-) > I'm using the standard ArialUnicodeMS font, but it doesn't > support Bold and Italic (according to Apache FOP), so when > I do <xsl:fo wrapper font-family="ArialUnicodeMS" font-style="italic">, > I get a 'no such font' error. I don't understand the real problem, maybe it's really a font problem. But why don't youe use "normal" Arial and change the encoding of your XSL:FO from UTF-8 to (for example) ISO-8859-1? > Does anyone know of a freeware Type I or TTF font Unicode font > with all glyphs present? > > Or -- has anyone written a stylesheet to manipulate the fonts to create > a bold or italic effect? (The former sounds likely, the latter impossible, > but I am just guessing.) > > Thanks in anticipation of any pointers > lee Regards, Joerg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSL:FO and Unicode Fonts, Lee Goddard | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL:FO and Unicode Fonts, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Date | Re: [xsl] Content constructors and , David Carlisle |
Month |