[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Wishes for XSL revisions ...


Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
From: terje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Terje Norderhaug)
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 19:08:07 -0800 (PST)

At 6:24 PM 12/29/01, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
>
>It is obvious that any function with implicit parameters cannot be used as a first
>class object (e.g. passed as parameter to other functions, or returned as their
>result). Such functions will be difficult to combine with other functions and
>generally to reuse. 

I suspect you are mistaken. Using function with implicit parameters as a first class objects  works fine in Common LISP, where implicit parameters will be captured in a closure that has the same extent as the function object.

-- Terje <terje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | Media Design in*Progress 
   Software for Mac Web Professionals at <http://www.in-progress.com>
   Take Advantage of Server Side XML and XSL with Interaction 3.6!



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords