[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Yan and Marty,
There's absolutely a difference between the following-sibling and following axes (as any reference book will tell you :-).
If they're not working as expected, why not post the relevant bit of your source document? with the offending bit of stylesheet so we can explain what it's really doing and why you should expect that. And don't forget to tell us what processor you're using so we know where to point our bug-detectors!
By drawing attention to the actual working of the language, you are also likely to elicit interesting and potentially useful comments, such as why following-sibling is preferable to following in cases when you could use either....
Newbies who like to lurk are often helped immensely by the folks bold enough to ask the question.
At 10:10 AM 12/28/01, you wrote:
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: [xsl] following vs following-sibling
Subject: Re: [xsl] following vs following-sibling From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:56:07 -0500 |
Yan and Marty,
There's absolutely a difference between the following-sibling and following axes (as any reference book will tell you :-).
If they're not working as expected, why not post the relevant bit of your source document? with the offending bit of stylesheet so we can explain what it's really doing and why you should expect that. And don't forget to tell us what processor you're using so we know where to point our bug-detectors!
By drawing attention to the actual working of the language, you are also likely to elicit interesting and potentially useful comments, such as why following-sibling is preferable to following in cases when you could use either....
Newbies who like to lurk are often helped immensely by the folks bold enough to ask the question.
Cheers, Wendell
At 10:10 AM 12/28/01, you wrote:
.. Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 08:52:24 -0600 .. From: Yan Zhu <yan.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> .. Subject: [xsl] following vs following-sibling .. .. Is there a difference between the two? I thought .. they are the same but: .. .. I tried: .. .. <xsl:value-of select="following::url"/> .. .. which worked, but this: .. .. <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::url"/> .. .. returns nothing while there is a following node, so .. they do behave differently? ..
following-sibling is a subset of following. following-sibling gets you only the children of the same parent as the current node; following gets all those plus their descendents.
--jeff
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] following vs following-si, Jeff Kenton | Thread | Re: [xsl] following vs following-si, Yan Zhu |
Re: [xsl] Re: Assignment no, dynami, Gunther Schadow | Date | [xsl] Extended chars problem..., Casadome, Francisco |
Month |
Keywords