[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #include file
Subject: RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #include file From: "Hellstern, Manny" <manny.hellstern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:58:30 -0600 |
Peter: Looks like you and David are in agreement. Thanks for the help. -----Original Message----- From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:39 AM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #include file > 1. My site has a lot of functionality all in one page because of the > ".innerHTML" technique I'm using. I only need specific scripts for specific > content so I didn't want to mass load all script. Fair enough. However, breaking the individual scripts into individual files will still work and won't cost you anything. > 2. When I use the ".innerHTML" method I notice that eventhough you can see > the representation with the browser, if you try to "viewsource" nothing > shows up. I'm thinking that If I output my script in the same manner I don't > have to bare my "script soul" to the world. Well I would guess that should be true either way? However, given the rather random behavior of IE at such times I have no real idea if that would be true. I suspect you could read in the entire JS file as a well formed XML fragment using document() by wrapping it in a CDATA. Start with a simple test and go from there. That will also tell you whether it is worth going to all the effort to go all the way... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #inc, Hellstern, Manny | Thread | [xsl] Re: grammar productions, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Using Transforms and #inc, Hellstern, Manny | Date | Re: [xsl] using variables and attri, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords