[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan

---

---

To clarify: the syntax for a "text declaration" is exactly the same as
an XML declaration e.g.:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

Is that correct?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	David Carlisle [SMTP:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 9:30 AM
> To:	xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:	Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element:
> Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
> 
> 
> > out of curiousity, would the above output be a well-formed external
> > general parsed entity, given that it starts with an xml declaration?
> 
> _if_ it started with an xml declaration it wouldn't be a well formed
> external
> general parsed entity, but that wasn't an xml declaration (despite the
> attribute name on xml-output) it was a text declaration.
> 
> David
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively
> call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---