[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 07:52 PM 5/16/01, Chris wrote [about nested templates]:
But, hypothetically, what would be the difference between these hypothetical nested-and-scoped templates, and the not-so-hypothetical (but often misapplied, and hence warned-against) xsl:for-each?
I suppose it would be okay for beginners to use nested templates? :->
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
RE: [xsl] nested templates?
Subject: RE: [xsl] nested templates? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:26:06 +0100 |
At 07:52 PM 5/16/01, Chris wrote [about nested templates]:
>The above seems to be illegal, though I can't think of a good reason why. > i've often wondered that myself it would get around a lot of problems and avoid a lot of cases where you need to use modes
But, hypothetically, what would be the difference between these hypothetical nested-and-scoped templates, and the not-so-hypothetical (but often misapplied, and hence warned-against) xsl:for-each?
I suppose it would be okay for beginners to use nested templates? :->
Cheers, Wendell
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] nested templates?, Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] nested templates?, Chris Bayes |
Re: [xsl] ShowTree XSL, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] Resolving Netscape 4.7, and I, Niranjan Perera |
Month |