[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based on Input/Output
Subject: Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based on Input/Output From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 14:04:44 +0100 |
Ingo Schildmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2001 11:38, Francis Norton wrote: > > <!-- always need a terminate condition in recursive functions --> > > <xsl:if test="count($todo) > 0"> > > This test does the same as test="$todo", which is > much more efficient for larger data, > if the processor doesn't optimize it anyway. > Quite right about the equivalence, though I don't know if doing count() on a node-set held in a variable will take as long as it would if gathering the node-set for the first time. Certainly "test='$todo'" is safer and better XSLT style. Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based , Ingo Schildmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based , Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] ANN: 4EXSLT (EXSLT common, jim | Date | Re: [xsl] Ordering of Blocks based , Francis Norton |
Month |
Keywords