[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments


Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:39:11 +0700

Adam Van Den Hoven wrote:
 
> If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT
> compliant, then I demand that when I use that document in a processor that
> is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly as I have specified.

This is not the case in XSLT 1.0.  For example:

- Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension functions or
extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but there is not guarantee
that a processor will be able to handle them.

- XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods and sorting
datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported.

- XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support
disable-output-escaping.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords