[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT 1.1 comments)
Subject: RE: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT 1.1 comments) From: "Stu Bloom" <sbloom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:52:58 -0600 |
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Translation: Somebody might do this, but we won't. And frankly we doubt it's possible. < Instead of "translation," how about "my interpretation." _My_ interpretation is that MS is saying that it _is_ possible; and what does it matter who implements it? ... and then he wrote: > we're going to teach everyone to rely on the Windows API that isn't available elsewhere. < As I understand it, the only .NET application scenario where the Windows API is involved is when you (the developer) make use of objects in the System.WinForms namespace, which you only do when you're creating Windows UI elements. None of the other namespaces reference any Windows API functions. (I think this has gone rather far afield from XSLT list subject matter, so this will be my last post in this thread.) Stu Bloom XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT , Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Joshua Allen |
RE: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT , Adam Van Den Hoven | Date | Re: [xsl] splitting the date field , jim smith |
Month |
Keywords