[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type)
Subject: Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 12:38:32 GMT |
> The meaning of my message is not to use binary cut at all -- it is > meaningless to optimise a problem one knows is eliminated... agreed! All I meant was to ask if the original had been coded in a tail recursive manner (as the original code wasn't posted until this morning (unless i missed it). > Probably other people will provide information about other popular XSLT > processors. In particular, I think most of the authors of these systems probably keep half an eye on this list.. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Kay Michael |
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, Kay Michael |
Month |
Keywords