[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type)
Subject: Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re: Char node-type) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 09:25:15 GMT |
> In my opinion there must be some requirements in the standard > specifications about the minimum expected robustness and reliability of > an XSLT processor. A good and necessary requirement of this type is > that an XSLT processor should not crash in typical recursive > processing. If I recall, scheme (and XSL's parent, DSSSL) mandate that implementations perform tail recursion elimination. XSLT of course hardly mandates anything about implementaions at all. However it would be good to know if the common implementations do do this, you said saxon does, what of the others? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, uche . ogbuji |
Re: Implementing recursion (Was Re:, David Carlisle | Date | RE: Default values for missing elem, Kay Michael |
Month |
Keywords