[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: New XSL working draft published
Subject: Re: New XSL working draft published From: Rick Geimer <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:27:16 -0700 |
Nikolai, Thanks for providing this link. It helps me tremendously. I second Sebastian's motion that the XSL working group review it and either approve it, or release a conforming version if they reject it. I understand that there are parts of XSL that cannot be represented in XML syntax, but a DTD can still get you 95% of the way there, which is much better than nothing. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx Nikolai Grigoriev wrote: > > Rick, > > > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several > > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm > > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order? > > at mid July, we have published a DTD for March 27 XSL FO WD at > http://www.renderx.com/Tests/validator/fo2000.dtd.html. It was also used by > FOP team to check their tests. Certainly, it is unofficial - it has not been > approved (not even commented) by the XSL WG. The WD of yesterday changed > only slightly from that of March, therefore I hope to publish a revised DTD > quite soon. > > Best regards, > > Nikolai Grigoriev > RenderX > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: New XSL working draft published, Nikolai Grigoriev | Thread | Re: New XSL working draft published, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Re: Need a Book, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: Error 80004005 eof - Microsoft , Wendell Piez |
Month |