[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: XSLT engine performance
Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:39:53 +0100 (BST) |
Heather Lindsay writes: > "bizarrely, Xalan produced the results even though it (rightly) said my > XML file was not valid against the DTD. Is this to be expected?" > > Why would you do performance testing with an XML file that is not valid > against its DTD? Wouldn't this affect the results unpredictably? I had forgotten that my XML file had IDREFs which were not satisfied, and Xalan was the only processor (by default) to do a parse. I agree, its silly of me, but in the circumstances it makes no difference. But still, isnt it surprising that Xalan bothered to do a formal parse, which produced errors, and then carried on regardless? Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT engine performance, Heather Lindsay | Thread | RE: XSLT engine performance, Kay Michael |
Re: XSLT engine performance, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | RE: Html Link to Open xsl, Ben C. |
Month |
Keywords