[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 15:41 20/07/2000, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
J
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Re: XSL as a Programming Language
Subject: Re: XSL as a Programming Language From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 10:34:00 +1000 |
At 15:41 20/07/2000, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
Perl is almost useless without the extensions written in C.
Now that's what I call flamebait! Are you sure you really mean this Paul?
Semantics of XSLT constructions is powerful enough + XSLT has one serious advantage comparing to other 'traditional' languages - it is a first nice mix of dataflow with processing code. Maybe there are / were better attempts - I don't know.
I would vote for Omnimark, as a user of it.
XSLT isn't worth a pile of beans without regular expressions, even if it has a lot of nice "structural" functionality.
J
------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL as a Programming Language, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: XSL as a Programming Language, Paul Tchistopolskii |
XSL function help required, Madhu Menon | Date | sql to xml question, Khaja, Saif |
Month |