[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Node-set vs. Result tree fragment
|
Subject: Node-set vs. Result tree fragment From: "Michael J. Hudson" <mhudson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:10:22 -0400 |
Newbie question: What exactly is the difference between a node-set and result tree fragment. If I have a node-set, will I be able to access the children of the nodes in that node-set? I tried writing a XSLT script that called a Java method and as a parameter send a node-set to that Java method. Now, I know this all varies from one processor to another... but I wasn't able to obtain the children of the node I passed into the Java method... just the node itself. I was using the Lotus XSLT processor... and am wondering if there is a way to pass a node-set or a result tree fragment so that I can access both the top nodes as well as its children. Is that what the node-set extensions in XT and such are for? ------------------------------------- Michael J. Hudson Software/Framework Engineer mhudson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cell-phone: 703.362.8039 voice-mail: 703.827.0638 ext. 4786 fax: 703.734.0987 Blueprint Technologies "The E-Solution Architect" http://www.blueprinttech.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: XSLT to transform XML data to f, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Node-set vs. Result tree fragme, Mike Brown |
| Re: parent(), Norman Walsh | Date | RE: child node using variable, Kay Michael |
| Month |
Keywords