[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Underlined Text
Subject: RE: Underlined Text From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:51:11 +0200 |
> Java doesn't really cut it on high volume sites, I'm > converting one right > now from Java based servlets/XSLT to a C implementation. > Performance is 6x > faster. This is a lot. Could you please elaborate a bit on what exactly the differences between the two setups are? Does the C version use a "streaming" form of XSLT where the input tree does not have to be completely built before output begins? Do you use a completely different approach? Does the Java engine have the necessary ressources to work -- i.e. enough memory, etc. Is performance drowning on being flattened to a textfile piped servlets? I have found the performance of Cocoon very sensitive to the underlying machine and it's configuration. It might be a similar issue for you. Best regards, -- Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "... plus ... Tubular Bells!" Stibo lokalnr 1212 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: How to generate char ",, Dan Morrison | Thread | tree in 2 xml files, Yasser El-Zein |
RE: Removing duplicate elements a-p, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: Cascading. ( Re: Recursive Temp, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Month |
Keywords