[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: feature request
Subject: Re: feature request From: "Rick Geimer" <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:38:33 -0700 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Its a fair point, but I don't think its new. The X* specs were created > in public, by "users", not implementors (per se), and they almost all > seemed to have decided that entities should not survive a parse. Take > them to task, but take them on at a higher level than XSLT, imho. But what about unparsed entities? They never get parsed, so why don't they survive? Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: feature request, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: feature request, David Carlisle |
Re: sorting nodes in reverse docume, Ann Marie Rubin - Su | Date | Which is correct, xt or SAXON?, James Petry |
Month |
Keywords