[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: feature request
Subject: Re: feature request From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:11:43 +0100 (BST) |
James Robertson writes: > Is it better to put the burden on the users or > the implementers? > > This is but one of many real-word issues that > has been encountered now that XML/XSL/XPath/etc > has gone "live". If there isn't a committment > to meet real-world needs, what are we all on > about? Its a fair point, but I don't think its new. The X* specs were created in public, by "users", not implementors (per se), and they almost all seemed to have decided that entities should not survive a parse. Take them to task, but take them on at a higher level than XSLT, imho. speaking as a user, I find xinclude easier to understand than entities anyway :-} Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: feature request, James Robertson | Thread | Re: feature request, Rick Geimer |
Re: feature request, David Carlisle | Date | Re: XSL and entities, Eric van der Vlist |
Month |