[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: XLST Processors Performace
Subject: Re: XLST Processors Performace From: Steve Willer <willer@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 00:52:36 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > obviously, the other XSLT processors (MS, Oracle C version, the > gingerall one), however laudable in some ways, simply lack all the > necessary language features. This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and essential? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XLST Processors Performace, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: XLST Processors Performace, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: Back to Basics: XPath and Conte, Michael Fuller | Date | cocoon start from command line, Sebastian Hauer |
Month |
Keywords