[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: XLST Processors Performace

---

---

On Tue, 9 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> obviously, the other XSLT processors (MS, Oracle C version, the
> gingerall one), however laudable in some ways, simply lack all the
> necessary language features.

This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was
planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent
completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and
essential?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---