[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: MSXML vs MSXSL vs Datachannel

---

---

My understanding of the past relationship we had with DataChannel was that
we collaborated with them in order to port MSXML 2.0 to Java.  As far as I
know, we are not currently collaborating, and I'm not aware of anything
planned for the future.

The XML component we ship is entitled MSXML and includes support for XML,
Namespaces, DOM, XSLT, XPath, and lots of other stuff.  Sometimes we refer
to the XSL and XSLT implementation portions of MSXML as MSXSL, but these
portions don't constitute a separate product.

- Jonathan Marsh
  Microsoft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Brown [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 12:02 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: MSXML vs MSXSL vs Datachannel
> 
> 
> Jonathan, or anyone from Microsoft--
> 
> Since we're on the topic of parsers, I was wondering if you 
> could clarify
> for everyone what the past, current and future relationship 
> is between the
> Datachannel XML parser and the MSXML parser.
> 
> Also, what is the correct way to refer to what comes with IE5 -- is it
> MSXML or MSXSL? I was under the impression that it's one 'thing' that
> functions as both an XML parser and an XSL processor. Do you have a
> preferred way of referring to it?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
>    - Mike
> ___________________________________________________________
> Mike J. Brown, software engineer, Webb Interactive Services
> XML/XSL stuff: http://www.skew.org/    http://www.webb.net/
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---