[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign

Subject: Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:29:06 -0400

> However, what no-one has addressed is that
> to use the XML->FO->MIF route, you are limited
> to only those features that are supported by
> _both_ formats.

Oh, I agree completely. Trying to fit FOs to a different formatting model
isn't easy which is one of the reasons why I try to do the lot in FOP.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, (continued) James Tauber - Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:19:30 -0400 James Robertson - Sat, 23 Oct 1999 21:31:54 +1000 Sebastian Rahtz - Sat, 23 Oct 1999 15:42:53 +0100 (BST) Didier PH Martin - Sat, 23 Oct 1999 11:19:17 -0400 James Tauber - Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:29:06 -0400 <= Sara Mitchell - Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:05:18 -0500 Didier PH Martin - Fri, 22 Oct 1999 17:03:29 -0400 Nikolai Grigoriev - Fri, 22 Oct 1999 03:09:14 +0400

Current Thread

Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, (continued)
- Nikolai Grigoriev - Fri, 22 Oct 1999 03:09:14 +0400

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, Didier PH Martin	Thread	Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, Sara Mitchell
Fwd: Re: limitations of preceding-s, Earl Bingham	Date	Re: MS XSL Variables, Bill Martschenko
	Month

Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company