[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: xsl:transform
Subject: Re: xsl:transform From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 21:57:24 +0200 |
Christopher R. Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... Some people wanted to use XSLT just for > transforms, and didn't want to mention "stylesheet" at all. At the same > time, XSLT was developed in support of a stylesheet language, and intended > primarily for use as same, and getting rid of the word "stylesheet" would > have been politically incorrect for a number of reasons. The programmers > on the WG agreed that supporting two names for the same thing is trivial, > and someone explaining the language can mention the synonym once (if at > all) and use the name of their choice consistently in discussions and > examples. <WildGuess> Is this also why disable-output-escaping is defined in the spec, but XSLT processors are not required to implement it? </WildGuess> Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: xsl:transform, Christopher R. Maden | Thread | xsl:transform, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Striping whitespace with LotusXSL, Garriss Jr.,James P. | Date | Re: xsl:transform, Christopher R. Maden |
Month |
Keywords