[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE:
RE:
|
Subject: RE: <xsl-script> From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 08:38:35 +0200 |
Free for non-commercial (educational & home) use, I understood... -----Original Message----- From: Rick Geimer [mailto:rick.geimer@xxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 1999 11:01 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: <xsl-script> Paul Prescod wrote: > James Robertson wrote: > > > > Yes, the full copy of Omnimark is very expensive. > > But when you factor in all the real costs of > > using other tools, I think it stacks up pretty > > well. > > No doubt that is true for you but most people will have a different > cost/benefit analysis. I wonder how people will evaluate this cost/benefit analysis now that the full version of OmniMark is free? Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: <xsl-script>, Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: <xsl-script>, James Robertson |
| Comments of the CSS WG chair on XSL, Guy Murphy | Date | RE: Leventhal's challenge misses th, Heikki Toivonen |
| Month |