[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful

Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful
From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 04:18:24 -0500

Jonathan Borden wrote:
>         So you are saying that it is possible to create a transformation which
> takes an arbitrary XFO -> XHTML and back i.e.

No. I only claim that that is the case for *abstract* information. I can't
provide a generalized definition of abstract information but in this
context we can use this one: "the information required to drive
non-graphical renditions of the information."

>From a graphical point of view, XFOs have a few features that XHTML+CSS do
not. I cannot enumerate these exhaustively, however.
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself

"Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have
performed better had it been tuned."
"Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that research
was sponsored by Micorosft."

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread